The Commonwealth Games are on. India is performing in full-swing, both in the games and the organizing of the same. Indians across the globe are proud, or maybe not.
Going through some old newspapers, looking for an article, I came across another article (that should tell you about my newspaper reading habits)!. This was in 'India on Sunday' which is published by the Sunday Guardian, simultaneously from Delhi and London. The article was titled 'CWG proves that we are still in awe of English tradition.'
To give a brief, the article was about the opening ceremony of the Commonwealth Games. But the writer, Akhilesh Mithal took this opportunity to voice his grievances against the British and the Raj.
To begin with, I failed to understand the relation of the headline to the body of the article. The article began with the mention of the XIX Commonwealth Games. But that is exactly where the connection ends. The rest of the article was a replay of the British Raj. As an Indian, I am not unaware of the Raj and the atrocities faced by my country men at the hand of the British. Neither am I ignorant of the still existent racism. And yet while reading the article I could not help but notice that the writer, Akhilesh Mithal sounded like the real racist. He took the opportunity of CWG and used it to express his own deep-seated, long suppressed grievances against the British.
The Raj ended in 1947. And the most painful result of this was the partition. Nevertheless, it has been 63 years since that day and India has come a long way. Mr. Mithal spoke of the 'awe' of the English tradition but forgot that the language that he expressed himself in was a gift of the same tradition. He attacked the system of education based on Macaulay's infamous Minute. But conveniently forgot that he too was educated in that same system which gave him the power and vocabulary to make this criticism. As it seemed from the article that Mr. Mithal is against the 'awe', he should probably consider joining a Hindi newspaper and express his grievances in the national language.
It was also a little difficult for me to comprehend the need to enlist all the atrocities faced by India as a British colony in reference to the CWG. I saw the opening of the games and nothing there was 'British' except, of course, Prince Charles and Princess Camilla. From the Gurukul Parampara to the various Indian dance forms, from yoga to the train and the depiction of Indian life, everything was rooted in India. If Mr. Mithal had a problem with the western technology used to depict the transformation of the country then I shall be forced to assume that he leads his life without the help of any western technologies.
Mr. Mithal seems to have a problem in appreciating anything good because he chooses to enumerate the negatives and not acknowledge the positives. I am an aware Indian, not blind to my culture or its history. Nor do I fall in the category for whom everything western is revered. Thus, it is important to acknowledge and accept the good and sieve out the bad. A contradiction of this nature does not suit a journalist, especially when he chooses to write for a paper that is simultaneously published in Delhi and 'London'.
The presence of this article in the newspaper was even more shocking because of the name of the editor: M.J. Akbar. Anyone who has ever followed his work or read his book would understand that here is a man who understands the Raj and its aftermath better than most of us. Thus, it was disheartening to see an article of this biased nature published under his leadership.
I would definitely like to congratulate the team of 'India on Sunday' on successfully bringing India to its people sitting miles away. But articles like these make me think that it is unfair to solely blame parties like RSS and Shiv Sena as being orthodox because the so-called progressive, modern, educated Indian is not very far behind.